[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e0b30ab8-d418-cbe0-d03c-a0aee1d48367@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 14:38:20 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Mark Railton <mark@...krailton.com>, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
jgross@...e.com
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Drivers: Xen: xlate_mmu.c: Fixed comment layout
On 07/23/2018 02:34 PM, Mark Railton wrote:
> Fixed issue with multi line comment
Fix [not Fixed]
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Railton <mark@...krailton.com>
> ---
> drivers/xen/xlate_mmu.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xlate_mmu.c b/drivers/xen/xlate_mmu.c
> index 23f1387b3ef7..3b03bc1641ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/xlate_mmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/xlate_mmu.c
> @@ -151,8 +151,9 @@ int xen_xlate_remap_gfn_array(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> struct remap_data data;
> unsigned long range = DIV_ROUND_UP(nr, XEN_PFN_PER_PAGE) << PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> - /* Kept here for the purpose of making sure code doesn't break
> - x86 PVOPS */
> + /* Kept here for the purpose of making sure code doesn't
> + * break x86 PVOPS
> + */
That is still not the preferred kernel multi-line comment style.
Documentation/process/coding-style.rst says:
/*
* This is the preferred style for multi-line
* comments in the Linux kernel source code.
* Please use it consistently.
*
* Description: A column of asterisks on the left side,
* with beginning and ending almost-blank lines.
*/
although Networking code has a slightly different preferred style (as in
your patch).
> BUG_ON(!((vma->vm_flags & (VM_PFNMAP | VM_IO)) == (VM_PFNMAP | VM_IO)));
>
> data.fgfn = gfn;
>
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists