linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Fix unwind errors from PEBS entries (mk-II)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180723133006.7mkzrdeaa4jo56md@treble>
Date:   Mon, 23 Jul 2018 08:30:06 -0500
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Prashant Bhole <bhole_prashant_q7@....ntt.co.jp>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Fix unwind errors from PEBS entries
 (mk-II)

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 11:19:54PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -143,6 +143,8 @@ enum perf_event_sample_format {
>  	PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR			= 1U << 19,
>  
>  	PERF_SAMPLE_MAX = 1U << 20,		/* non-ABI */
> +
> +	__PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN_EARLY		= 1UL << 63,

Given the kbuild test robot errors for building on 32-bit, looks like
the 63 needs to be changed to 31 so it fits in an int?

-- 
Josh