Message-ID: <20180723162735.GA5980@cmpxchg.org>
Date:   Mon, 23 Jul 2018 12:27:35 -0400
From:   Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-team@...com, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@...eaurora.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] mm: workingset: tell cache transitions from
 workingset thrashing

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 05:35:35PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org> wrote:
> > From 1d24635a6c7cd395bad5c29a3b9e5d2e98d9ab84 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> > Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:18:23 -0400
> > Subject: [PATCH] arm64: fix vmemmap BUILD_BUG_ON() triggering on !vmemmap
> >  setups
> >
> > Arnd reports the following arm64 randconfig build error with the PSI
> > patches that add another page flag:
> >
> 
> You could add further text here that I had just added to my
> patch description (not sent):
> 
>     Further experiments show that the build error already existed before,
>     but was only triggered with larger values of CONFIG_NR_CPU and/or
>     CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT that might be used in actual configurations but
>     not in randconfig builds.
> 
>     With longer CPU and node masks, I could recreate the problem with
>     kernels as old as linux-4.7 when arm64 NUMA support got added.
> 
>     Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>     Fixes: 1a2db300348b ("arm64, numa: Add NUMA support for arm64 platforms.")
>     Fixes: 3e1907d5bf5a ("arm64: mm: move vmemmap region right below
> the linear region")

Sure thing.

> >  arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > index 1b18b4722420..72c9b6778b0a 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > @@ -611,11 +611,13 @@ void __init mem_init(void)
> >         BUILD_BUG_ON(TASK_SIZE_32                       > TASK_SIZE_64);
> >  #endif
> >
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
> >         /*
> 
> I tested it on two broken configurations, and found that you have
> a typo here, it should be 'ifdef', not 'ifndef'. With that change, it
> seems to build fine.
> 
> Tested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

Thanks for testing it, I don't have a cross-compile toolchain set up.

---

>From 34c4c4549f09f971d2d391a8d652d56cb9b05475 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:18:23 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: fix vmemmap BUILD_BUG_ON() triggering on !vmemmap
 setups

Arnd reports the following arm64 randconfig build error with the PSI
patches that add another page flag:

  /git/arm-soc/arch/arm64/mm/init.c: In function 'mem_init':
  /git/arm-soc/include/linux/compiler.h:357:38: error: call to
  '__compiletime_assert_618' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON
  failed: sizeof(struct page) > (1 << STRUCT_PAGE_MAX_SHIFT)

The additional page flag causes other information stored in
page->flags to get bumped into their own struct page member:

  #if SECTIONS_WIDTH+ZONES_WIDTH+NODES_SHIFT+LAST_CPUPID_SHIFT <=
  BITS_PER_LONG - NR_PAGEFLAGS
  #define LAST_CPUPID_WIDTH LAST_CPUPID_SHIFT
  #else
  #define LAST_CPUPID_WIDTH 0
  #endif

  #if defined(CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING) && LAST_CPUPID_WIDTH == 0
  #define LAST_CPUPID_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS
  #endif

which in turn causes the struct page size to exceed the size set in
STRUCT_PAGE_MAX_SHIFT. This value is an an estimate used to size the
VMEMMAP page array according to address space and struct page size.

However, the check is performed - and triggers here - on a !VMEMMAP
config, which consumes an additional 22 page bits for the sparse
section id. When VMEMMAP is enabled, those bits are returned, cpupid
doesn't need its own member, and the page passes the VMEMMAP check.

Restrict that check to the situation it was meant to check: that we
are sizing the VMEMMAP page array correctly.

Says Arnd:

    Further experiments show that the build error already existed before,
    but was only triggered with larger values of CONFIG_NR_CPU and/or
    CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT that might be used in actual configurations but
    not in randconfig builds.

    With longer CPU and node masks, I could recreate the problem with
    kernels as old as linux-4.7 when arm64 NUMA support got added.

Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Tested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: 1a2db300348b ("arm64, numa: Add NUMA support for arm64 platforms.")
Fixes: 3e1907d5bf5a ("arm64: mm: move vmemmap region right below the linear region")
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
---
 arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
index 1b18b4722420..86d9f9d303b0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
@@ -611,11 +611,13 @@ void __init mem_init(void)
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(TASK_SIZE_32			> TASK_SIZE_64);
 #endif
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
 	/*
 	 * Make sure we chose the upper bound of sizeof(struct page)
-	 * correctly.
+	 * correctly when sizing the VMEMMAP array.
 	 */
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct page) > (1 << STRUCT_PAGE_MAX_SHIFT));
+#endif
 
 	if (PAGE_SIZE >= 16384 && get_num_physpages() <= 128) {
 		extern int sysctl_overcommit_memory;
-- 
2.18.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists