lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNARP2HZ8GdsAU8h_b04jLWbvFXTWqiVt2hpE0vJbjP82ZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 25 Jul 2018 13:30:24 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>,
        Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arch@...ts.infradead.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: include architecture Kconfig files from top-level Kconfig v3

2018-07-25 2:56 GMT+09:00 Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>:
> Hi Masahiro,
>
> what do you think about the series below, which moves the includes
> of all the architecture independ Kconfig files to the top-level
> Kconfig instead of duplicating the includes in all architectures?
>
> Note that this only handles the low-hanging fruite, there are a lot
> of other bits that should probably be cleaned up to be common,
> but those will be not entirely trivial.
>
> Changes since v2:
>  - fix the missing sh conversion
>  - handle the lack of CONFIG_SWAP support in microblaze and nios2 properly
>
> Changes since v1:
>  - add back a remove source statement from arch/arm/Kconfig
>  - various fixes from Randy
>  - various UML patches to be able to use the common Kconfig
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


This version passed my tests.


Could you check the difference of CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT, please?


For alpha, hexagon, um,
CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT was previously never enabled
because kernel/Kconfig.preempt was not included.

Now, CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT can be enabled
if it is select'ed by someone.

I guess this change will be OK, but
I'd like you and Randy to double-check it just in case.



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ