[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180726172143.GA9836@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 19:21:43 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arch@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: include architecture Kconfig files from top-level Kconfig v3
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 01:30:24PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Could you check the difference of CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT, please?
>
>
> For alpha, hexagon, um,
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT was previously never enabled
> because kernel/Kconfig.preempt was not included.
>
> Now, CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT can be enabled
> if it is select'ed by someone.
>
> I guess this change will be OK, but
> I'd like you and Randy to double-check it just in case.
It might be fine, but with this little fix folded in we should be
safer:
diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.preempt b/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
index cd1655122ec0..1321a4a7a677 100644
--- a/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
+++ b/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
@@ -57,4 +57,5 @@ config PREEMPT
endchoice
config PREEMPT_COUNT
- bool
\ No newline at end of file
+ depends on !ARCH_NO_PREEMPT
+ bool
Powered by blists - more mailing lists