[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87va93pv6w.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 10:37:43 +0200
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Roman Kagan <rkagan@...tuozzo.com>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
"Michael Kelley \(EOSG\)" <Michael.H.Kelley@...rosoft.com>,
Mohammed Gamal <mmorsy@...hat.com>,
Cathy Avery <cavery@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Liran Alon <liran.alon@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] KVM: nVMX: optimize prepare_vmcs02{,_full} for Enlightened VMCS case
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> writes:
> On 21/06/2018 14:30, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> +static __always_inline bool evmcs_needs_write(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx,
>> + u16 clean_field)
>> +{
>> + if (vmx->nested.dirty_vmcs12)
>> + return true;
>
> Why is this needed? If it weren't for it, you could pass hv_evmcs
> directly to evmcs_needs_write, which would simplify the code a bit in
> the caller.
This is an equivalent of prepare_vmcs02()/prepare_vmcs02_full() split
for eVMCS case: when we switch from L2 guest A to L2 guest B we need to
write the whole VMCS so evmcs_needs_write() needs to return true.
We can, however, make an optimisation: forcefuly reset hv_clean_fields
mask on enlightened vmptrld making 'dirty_vmcs12' check redundant.
This series was posted quite some time ago, I'll rebase and re-test with
the fix included.
Thanks!
--
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists