linux-kernel - Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3] qemu: Add virtio pmem device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4226742.54063347.1532522849803.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 25 Jul 2018 08:47:29 -0400 (EDT)
From:   Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com>
To:     Eric Blake <eblake@...hat.com>
Cc:     kwolf@...hat.com, haozhong zhang <haozhong.zhang@...el.com>,
        nilal@...hat.com, jack@...e.cz,
        xiaoguangrong eric <xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com>,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, riel@...riel.com, linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org,
        david@...hat.com, ross zwisler <ross.zwisler@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
        hch@...radead.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, mst@...hat.com,
        stefanha@...hat.com, niteshnarayanlal@...mail.com,
        imammedo@...hat.com, dan j williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        lcapitulino@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3] qemu: Add virtio pmem device




> 
> >>
> >> This patch has no n/M in the subject line; but is included in a thread
> >> that also has a 0/2 cover letter, as well as 1/2 and 2/2 patches in
> >> separate mails.  Is that intentional?
> > 
> > Yes, kernel series has 0-2 patches and Qemu has this one. I thought its
> > good to keep separate numbering for both the sets.
> 
> Ah, that makes sense. The cover letter didn't make it obvious to me that
> this was two separate series to two projects, but related enough that
> both series have to be incorporated for the feature to work and thus
> cross-posted under a single cover letter.

Will try to make it more clear in next posting.

Thanks,
Pankaj