[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180725135632.zmjq7cuqc7eshpsh@treble>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 08:56:32 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Artem Savkov <asavkov@...hat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes: fix trace_probe flags in enable_trace_kprobe
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:28:26PM +0200, Artem Savkov wrote:
> If enable_trace_kprobe fails to enable the probe in enable_k(ret)probe
> it returns an error, but does not unset the tp flags it set previosly.
"previously"
> @@ -424,6 +423,16 @@ enable_trace_kprobe(struct trace_kprobe *tk, struct trace_event_file *file)
> else
> ret = enable_kprobe(&tk->rp.kp);
> }
> +
> + if (ret) {
> + if (file) {
> + list_del(&link->list);
Should this be list_del_rcu(), since it was added to the list with
list_add_tail_rcu()?
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists