[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180726081015.GA22702@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 10:10:15 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, tglx@...utronix.de,
jason@...edaemon.net, marc.zyngier@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, shorne@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] RISC-V: simplify software interrupt / IPI code
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 02:44:32PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> I think it's probably easier to have the whole patch set go through the IRQ
> tree, so I won't put these in the RISC-V tree unless someone says something.
No matter where it goes it probably makes sense to keep the whole
series together..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists