[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABb+yY1DQbGnWL=HZc=xPLdJjKgkpdvCHmm6Pr6_MvERR=D56Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 17:06:46 +0530
From: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
To: "A.s. Dong" <aisheng.dong@....com>
Cc: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
", Sascha Hauer" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
", linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, srv_heupstream"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] dt-bindings: mailbox: allow mbox-cells to be equal
to 0
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 4:30 PM, A.s. Dong <aisheng.dong@....com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jassi Brar [mailto:jassisinghbrar@...il.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 5:42 PM
>> To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
>> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>; Fabio Estevam
>> <fabio.estevam@....com>; Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>; Mark
>> Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>; A.s. Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>;
>> Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com>; Sudeep Holla
>> <sudeep.holla@....com>; Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>;
>> Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; , Sascha Hauer
>> <kernel@...gutronix.de>; , linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-
>> mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, srv_heupstream <linux-arm-
>> kernel@...ts.infradead.org>; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] dt-bindings: mailbox: allow mbox-cells to be
>> equal to 0
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:23 PM, Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
>> wrote:
>> > From: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>
>> >
>> > Mailbox devices may have only one channel which means the mbox-cells
>> > at least 1 does not make sense for this type devices. Let's remove
>> > that limitation to allow the mbox-cells to be equal to 0.
>> >
>> OK
>>
>> But please realise that you'll have to write more code -- implement your own
>> of_xlate() callback.
>> Most developers would prefer to call the only channel as channel number 0,
>> and use the common of_xlate implementation.
>>
>
> Yes, that's true because the common of_xlate assuming the mbox-cells is 1.
> And there's already such users:
> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi
>
You mean that is a good thing, right?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists