[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180726115705.GB2051@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 13:57:05 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
Avi Kivity <avi@...lladb.com>, linux-aio@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] aio: add a iocb refcount
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 04:22:27AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:29:01AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > + atomic_t ki_refcnt;
>
> Should this be a refcount_t instead? At first glance your usage seems
> compatible with refcount_t.
I though the magic 0 meaning would be incompatible with a refcnt_t.
I'll investigate and respin if it ends up being ok.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists