[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180726152427.cjji4ymwfjifja4q@flea>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 17:24:27 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
To: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to
rebase on M2 Ultra
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 08:47:34PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>
>
> 于 2018年7月26日 GMT+08:00 下午8:41:19, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com> 写到:
> >On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:36:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> >> Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software compatible
> >with
> >> BPi M2 Ultra,
> >
> >Do you have a reference for this?
>
> See [1], it says "BPI-M2U and BPI-M2 Berry share the same image".
>
> [1] http://www.banana-pi.org/download.html
Debian supports different SoC from different vendor using the same
image, so it's not really a good argument to share the device tree. I
mean, you can even boot an H3 to a shell using an A33 device tree.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists