[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7A9506F1-7052-4801-B735-296370EBBA7C@aosc.io>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 23:26:19 +0800
From: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
CC: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra
于 2018年7月26日 GMT+08:00 下午11:24:27, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com> 写到:
>On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 08:47:34PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>>
>>
>> 于 2018年7月26日 GMT+08:00 下午8:41:19, Maxime Ripard
><maxime.ripard@...tlin.com> 写到:
>> >On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:36:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> >> Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software compatible
>> >with
>> >> BPi M2 Ultra,
>> >
>> >Do you have a reference for this?
>>
>> See [1], it says "BPI-M2U and BPI-M2 Berry share the same image".
>>
>> [1] http://www.banana-pi.org/download.html
>
>Debian supports different SoC from different vendor using the same
>image, so it's not really a good argument to share the device tree. I
>mean, you can even boot an H3 to a shell using an A33 device tree.
Please note that the vendor image is fully functional BSP
image, neither a function limited one nor one without
HW configuration.
>
>Maxime
Powered by blists - more mailing lists