linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] x86/kvm/lapic: always disable MMIO interface in x2APIC mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87sh41nkz5.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Jul 2018 11:14:54 +0200
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] x86/kvm/lapic: always disable MMIO interface in x2APIC mode

Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> writes:

> On 27/07/2018 18:48, Jim Mattson wrote:
>> On a physical machine, I would expect the default local APIC page to
>> fall in the PCI hole, so it would be correct to sink writes and to
>> return all ones for reads. Does qemu implement a PCI hole, and does
>> this address fall into it?
>
> It does implement a PCI hole, but when using the kernel LAPIC it expects
> that only devices write to that range; therefore that address doesn't
> fall into the PCI hole, and instead it generates an MSIs.

Yes, and that's why I believe it's correct to never forward lapic
reads/writes from KVM to userspace when lapic is in kernel.

"RFC" was mostly about the inconsistency with the case when APIC access
page is in use. To be 100% correct I would suggest to somehow make it
behave like MMIO hole in case we're in x2APIC/disabled mode too.

-- 
  Vitaly