lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 30 Jul 2018 11:27:28 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [rt-patch 3/3] arm, KVM: convert vgic_irq.irq_lock to
 raw_spinlock_t

On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 11:07:33AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> 
> b103cc3f10c0 ("KVM: arm/arm64: Avoid timer save/restore in vcpu entry/exit")
> requires vgic_irq.irq_lock be converted to raw_spinlock_t.
> 
> Problem: kvm_preempt_ops.sched_in = kvm_sched_in;
>    kvm_sched_in()
>       kvm_arch_vcpu_load()
>          kvm_timer_vcpu_load() <- b103cc3f10c0 addition
>             kvm_timer_vcpu_load_gic()
>                kvm_vgic_map_is_active()
>                   spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
> 
> Quoting virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c, locking order is...
> 
>   kvm->lock (mutex)
>     its->cmd_lock (mutex)
>       its->its_lock (mutex)
>         vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock         must be taken with IRQs disabled
>           kvm->lpi_list_lock           must be taken with IRQs disabled
>             vgic_irq->irq_lock         must be taken with IRQs disabled
> 
> ...meaning vgic_dist.lpi_list_lock and vgic_cpu.ap_list_lock must be
> converted as well.

The thing missing from the Changelog is the analysis that all the work
done under these locks is indeed properly bounded and cannot cause
excessive latencies.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ