[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180730092728.GE2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 11:27:28 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [rt-patch 3/3] arm, KVM: convert vgic_irq.irq_lock to
raw_spinlock_t
On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 11:07:33AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> b103cc3f10c0 ("KVM: arm/arm64: Avoid timer save/restore in vcpu entry/exit")
> requires vgic_irq.irq_lock be converted to raw_spinlock_t.
>
> Problem: kvm_preempt_ops.sched_in = kvm_sched_in;
> kvm_sched_in()
> kvm_arch_vcpu_load()
> kvm_timer_vcpu_load() <- b103cc3f10c0 addition
> kvm_timer_vcpu_load_gic()
> kvm_vgic_map_is_active()
> spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
>
> Quoting virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c, locking order is...
>
> kvm->lock (mutex)
> its->cmd_lock (mutex)
> its->its_lock (mutex)
> vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock must be taken with IRQs disabled
> kvm->lpi_list_lock must be taken with IRQs disabled
> vgic_irq->irq_lock must be taken with IRQs disabled
>
> ...meaning vgic_dist.lpi_list_lock and vgic_cpu.ap_list_lock must be
> converted as well.
The thing missing from the Changelog is the analysis that all the work
done under these locks is indeed properly bounded and cannot cause
excessive latencies.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists