[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1807301411010.2518@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 14:19:47 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@....com>,
Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>, gkohli@...eaurora.org,
neeraju@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpu/hotplug: Fix cpuhp_step name for timers
Mukesh,
On Thu, 26 Jul 2018, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Can i get input on this ?
Sure.
> Thanks,
> Mukesh
> On 7/24/2018 8:17 PM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
The input you get is that it's unprofessional to poke people after TWO days
about a patch which is purely cosmetic.
It's perfectly fine to send a reminder after a week for important changes
and after two for trivial cleanups like this. You really cannot expect that
maintainers and other developers permanentely sit there twiddling thumbs
and wait for new mail to arrive in order to reply immediately.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists