linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] parisc: prefer _THIS_IP_ and _RET_IP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 1 Aug 2018 15:18:19 -0700
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To:     dave.anglin@...l.net
Cc:     deller@....de, jejb@...isc-linux.org,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        pravin.shedge4linux@...il.com,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] parisc: prefer _THIS_IP_ and _RET_IP_ statement expressions

On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 3:12 PM John David Anglin <dave.anglin@...l.net> wrote:
>
> On 2018-08-01 5:49 PM, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > Thoughts?  Idea being there's only one call site in your tree that has
> > this requirement (and the other one in
> > include/net/inet_connection_sock.h I don't think is correct, and will
> > send a patch out imminently).

Turns out it is correct (I assumed by caller, they meant _RET_IP_, but
they're in an inline function). https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/8/1/1687 is
the patch.

> What about the uses in the fs support, etc?

Sorry, I don't see it?

$ ag current_text_addr
and
$ grep -R current_text_addr

turn up nothing in fs/.  Is this torvals/linux with no out of tree patches?
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers