linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] parisc: prefer _THIS_IP_ and _RET_IP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54b2139b-53d2-01c5-f240-93a692cdbc59@bell.net>
Date:   Wed, 1 Aug 2018 18:12:33 -0400
From:   John David Anglin <dave.anglin@...l.net>
To:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc:     deller@....de, jejb@...isc-linux.org,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        pravin.shedge4linux@...il.com,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] parisc: prefer _THIS_IP_ and _RET_IP_ statement
 expressions

On 2018-08-01 5:49 PM, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> Thoughts?  Idea being there's only one call site in your tree that has
> this requirement (and the other one in
> include/net/inet_connection_sock.h I don't think is correct, and will
> send a patch out imminently).
What about the uses in the fs support, etc?

Dave

-- 
John David Anglin  dave.anglin@...l.net