[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180801120551.ju6zhxhoef6w5zim@mwanda>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 15:05:51 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Jheng-Jhong Wu <goodwater.wu@...il.com>,
Palle Christensen <palle.christensen@...rosemi.com>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Palle Christensen <palle.christensen@...rosemi.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Arun Nagendran <arunrasppi@...il.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging:mt29f_spinand: MT29F2G failing as only 16-bit
arguments and variables used for addressing.
On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 11:24:19AM +0800, Jheng-Jhong Wu wrote:
> For NAND flash chips with more than 1Gbit (e.g. MT29F2G) more than 16 bits
> are necessary to address the correct page. The driver sets the address for
> more than 16 bits, but it uses 16-bit arguments and variables (these are
> page_id, block_id, row) to do address operations. Obviously, these
> arguments and variables cannot deal with more than 16-bit address.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jheng-Jhong Wu <goodwater.wu@...il.com>
This seems reasonable... It would be needed to make commit 6efb21d6d0e7
("staging:mt29f_spinand: MT29F2G failing as only 16 bits used for
addressing.") work. It also fixes a static checker warning.
My only concern is that the mtd/nand code seems to use -1 as a magical
page_id. For example:
2069 /**
2070 * nand_exit_status_op - Exit a STATUS operation
2071 * @chip: The NAND chip
2072 *
2073 * This function sends a READ0 command to cancel the effect of the STATUS
2074 * command to avoid reading only the status until a new read command is sent.
2075 *
2076 * This function does not select/unselect the CS line.
2077 *
2078 * Returns 0 on success, a negative error code otherwise.
2079 */
2080 int nand_exit_status_op(struct nand_chip *chip)
2081 {
2082 struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
2083
2084 if (chip->exec_op) {
2085 struct nand_op_instr instrs[] = {
2086 NAND_OP_CMD(NAND_CMD_READ0, 0),
2087 };
2088 struct nand_operation op = NAND_OPERATION(instrs);
2089
2090 return nand_exec_op(chip, &op);
2091 }
2092
2093 chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_READ0, -1, -1);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^
2094
2095 return 0;
2096 }
2097 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nand_exit_status_op);
I'm not sure if this affect spinand_read_page() etc.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists