[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <16141309.kTfAWOe8rM@phil>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 14:33:36 +0200
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>
Cc: hjc@...k-chips.com, airlied@...ux.ie, ajitn.linux@...il.com,
daniel@...ll.ch, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/rockchip: Convert drm_atomic_helper_suspend/resume()
Hi Souptick,
Am Dienstag, 31. Juli 2018, 22:34:30 CEST schrieb Souptick Joarder:
> convert drm_atomic_helper_suspend/resume() to use
> drm_mode_config_helper_suspend/resume().
>
> With this conversion, rockchip_drm_fb_resume() and
> rockchip_drm_fb_suspend() will not be used anymore.
> Both of these functions can be removed.
>
> Also, in struct rockchip_drm_private state will not be
> used anymore. So this can be removed forever.
>
> Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ajit Negi <ajitn.linux@...il.com>
the patch itself looks great, just a simple bookkeeping question.
What role did Ajit play in creating the patch? If I remember correctly
it is meant to be
- 1st Signed-off: Patch-Author
- 2nd Signed-off: E-Mail sender + patch possibly patch changes
(optional of course if the same)
So was this meant to be a Reviewed-by from Ajit?
Thanks
Heiko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists