linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/rockchip: Convert drm_atomic_helper

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFqt6zZfLXuMUT75a3dWKeiCCmKZOfi=FdTeFRjcdFDZdfcRVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Aug 2018 18:13:47 +0530
From:   Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>
To:     Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc:     hjc@...k-chips.com, airlied@...ux.ie,
        Ajit Linux <ajitn.linux@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/rockchip: Convert drm_atomic_helper_suspend/resume()

On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 6:03 PM, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de> wrote:
> Hi Souptick,
>
> Am Dienstag, 31. Juli 2018, 22:34:30 CEST schrieb Souptick Joarder:
>> convert drm_atomic_helper_suspend/resume() to use
>> drm_mode_config_helper_suspend/resume().
>>
>> With this conversion, rockchip_drm_fb_resume() and
>> rockchip_drm_fb_suspend() will not be used anymore.
>> Both of these functions can be removed.
>>
>> Also, in struct rockchip_drm_private state will not be
>> used anymore. So this can be removed forever.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ajit Negi <ajitn.linux@...il.com>
>
> the patch itself looks great, just a simple bookkeeping question.
>
> What role did Ajit play in creating the patch? If I remember correctly
> it is meant to be
> - 1st Signed-off: Patch-Author
> - 2nd Signed-off: E-Mail sender + patch possibly patch changes
> (optional of course if the same)
>
> So was this meant to be a Reviewed-by from Ajit?

We both are working together for these patches to
convert drm_atomic_helper_suspend/resume().
That's the reason to add his name in 2nd Signed-off
in all similar patches.

Is it a incorrect way to put 2nd Signed-off here ?