[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180801124144.GF24836@rapoport-lnx>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 15:41:45 +0300
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] um: switch to NO_BOOTMEM
Hi Richard,
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 09:03:35PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 31. Juli 2018, 15:38:27 CEST schrieb Mike Rapoport:
> > Any comments on this?
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 04:23:12PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > These patches convert UML to use NO_BOOTMEM.
> > > Tested on x86-64.
> > >
> > > Mike Rapoport (2):
> > > um: setup_physmem: stop using global variables
> > > um: switch to NO_BOOTMEM
> > >
> > > arch/um/Kconfig.common | 2 ++
> > > arch/um/kernel/physmem.c | 22 ++++++++++------------
> > > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Thanks!
Can you please merge this through the uml tree?
> Thanks,
> //richard
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists