linux-kernel - Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: soc-pcm: Use delay set in pointer function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <12bd6a6d-53ec-46f6-7f0e-af20e219d630@amd.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Aug 2018 09:31:10 +0530
From:   "Agrawal, Akshu" <Akshu.Agrawal@....com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc:     Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        "moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM..." 
        <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, Alexander.Deucher@....com,
        djkurtz@...omium.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: soc-pcm: Use delay set in pointer
 function



On 7/31/2018 8:10 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 03:56:52PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>> Mark Brown wrote:
> 
>>> Yes.  I'm saying that if the CPU DAI thinks it can figure out the base
>>> delay something is confused.
> 
>> Then basically Akshu's patch does the correct thing, I suppose.
> 
> I think so.  Could perhaps do with a little clarification though.
> 

Ok Mark, I will submit a v2 which makes it more clear on the intent.

Thanks,
Akshu