[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e2b74e25-9fbd-312b-8fd5-e2e72ad79771@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 12:12:30 +0800
From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
To: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
CC: <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
<keescook@...omium.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: berlin: fix 'pctrl->functions' allocation in
berlin_pinctrl_build_state
On 2018/8/1 10:36, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 22:25:01 +0800 YueHaibing wrote:
>
>> fixes following Smatch static check warning:
>>
>> drivers/pinctrl/berlin/berlin.c:237 berlin_pinctrl_build_state()
>> warn: passing devm_ allocated variable to kfree. 'pctrl->functions'
>>
>> As we will be calling krealloc() on pointer 'pctrl->functions', which means
>> kfree() will be called in there, devm_kzalloc() shouldn't be used with
>> the allocation in the first place. Fix the warning by calling kcalloc()
>> and managing the free procedure in error path on our own.
>
> Good catch. Comments below.
>
>>
>> Fixes: 3de68d331c24 ("pinctrl: berlin: add the core pinctrl driver for Marvell Berlin SoCs")
>> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pinctrl/berlin/berlin.c | 14 ++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/berlin/berlin.c b/drivers/pinctrl/berlin/berlin.c
>> index d6d183e..db2afb2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/berlin/berlin.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/berlin/berlin.c
>> @@ -216,10 +216,8 @@ static int berlin_pinctrl_build_state(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> }
>>
>> /* we will reallocate later */
>> - pctrl->functions = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev,
>> - max_functions,
>> - sizeof(*pctrl->functions),
>> - GFP_KERNEL);
>> + pctrl->functions = kcalloc(max_functions,
>> + sizeof(*pctrl->functions), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!pctrl->functions)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> @@ -257,8 +255,10 @@ static int berlin_pinctrl_build_state(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> function++;
>> }
>>
>> - if (!found)
>> + if (!found) {
>> + kfree(function);
>
> is it enough to just free one function? I think we need to free functions.
Yep, should free 'pctrl->functions', Thanks!
Will send v2.
>
>> return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>>
>> if (!function->groups) {
>> function->groups =
>> @@ -267,8 +267,10 @@ static int berlin_pinctrl_build_state(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> sizeof(char *),
>> GFP_KERNEL);
>>
>> - if (!function->groups)
>> + if (!function->groups) {
>> + kfree(function);
>
> ditto
>
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> groups = function->groups;
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists