[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8e863a43-b356-809a-93f7-a780e45fdce8@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 12:27:51 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Liran Alon <liran.alon@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] x86/kvm/nVMX: optimize MMU switch between L1 and L2
On 02/08/2018 12:01, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Brief look at SVM makes me think it can be optimized the exact same way.
> I'll do this in a separate series if nobody objects.
If you want to rewrite nested SVM altogether to look more like VMX,
that's also a good idea. :) All the stuff like check_nested_events and
nested_run_pending should apply to SVM as well.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists