linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mips: switch to NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180802115550.GA10232@rapoport-lnx>
Date:   Thu, 2 Aug 2018 14:55:51 +0300
From:   Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     "Fancer's opinion" <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
        Paul Burton <Paul.Burton@...s.com>
Cc:     Linux-MIPS <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips: switch to NO_BOOTMEM

Hi,

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:55:53PM +0300, Fancer's opinion wrote:
> Hello, folks
> Regarding the no_bootmem patchset I've sent earlier.
> I'm terribly sorry about huge delay with response. I got sucked in a new
> project, so just didn't have a time to proceed with the series, answer to the
> questions and resend the set.
> If it is still relevant and needed for community, I can get back to the series
> on the next week, answer to the Mett's questions (sorry, man, for doing it so
> long), rebase it on top of the kernel 4.18 and resend the new version. We also
> can try to combine it with this patch, if it is found convenient.

So, what would be the best way to move forward?

> Regards,
> -Sergey
> 
> 
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2018, 20:20 Paul Burton, <paul.burton@...s.com> wrote:
> 
>     Hi Mike,
> 
>     On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:03:56AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>     > Any comments on this?
> 
>     I haven't looked at this in detail yet, but there was a much larger
>     series submitted to accomplish this not too long ago, which needed
>     another revision:
> 
>         https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/project/linux-mips/list/?series=787&
>     state=*
> 
>     Given that, I'd be (pleasantly) surprised if this one smaller patch is
>     enough.
> 
>     Thanks,
>         Paul
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.