linux-kernel - Re: framebuffer corruption due to overlapping stp instructions on arm64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Aug 2018 09:53:49 +0200
From:   Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
To:     Andrew Pinski <pinskia@...il.com>, mpatocka@...hat.com
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        GNU C Library <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>
Subject: Re: framebuffer corruption due to overlapping stp instructions on
 arm64

On 08/03/2018 09:11 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> Yes fix Links not to use memcpy on the framebuffer.
> It is undefined behavior to use device memory with memcpy.

Some (de facto) ABIs require that it is supported, though.  For example, 
the POWER string functions avoid unaligned loads and stores for this 
reason because the platform has the same issue with device memory.  And 
yes, GCC will expand memcpy on POWER to something that is incompatible 
with device memory. 8-(

If we don't want people to use memcpy, we probably need to provide a 
credible alternative.

Thanks,
Florian