linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/46] dmaengine: edma: use dmaenginem_async_device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180803075434.GB29473@hsj-Precision-5520>
Date:   Fri, 3 Aug 2018 15:54:35 +0800
From:   Huang Shijie <sjhuang@...vatar.ai>
To:     Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc:     vkoul@...nel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dave.jiang@...el.com,
        radhey.shyam.pandey@...inx.com, appana.durga.rao@...inx.com,
        jmkrzyszt@...il.com, gomonovych@...il.com, keescook@...omium.org,
        horms+renesas@...ge.net.au, geert+renesas@...der.be,
        shawnguo@...nel.org, baoyou.xie@...aro.org,
        michal.simek@...inx.com, baohua@...nel.org,
        ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
        david.brown@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/46] dmaengine: edma: use
 dmaenginem_async_device_register to simplify the code

On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 10:50:13AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2018-08-03 10:19, Huang Shijie wrote:
> > Use dmaenginem_async_device_register to simplify the code:
> >    remove dma_async_device_unregister
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <sjhuang@...vatar.ai>
> > ---
> >  drivers/dma/ti/edma.c | 8 ++------
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti/edma.c b/drivers/dma/ti/edma.c
> > index ceabdea40ae0..28ba1e722c47 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma/ti/edma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma/ti/edma.c
> > @@ -2388,18 +2388,17 @@ static int edma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	ecc->dma_slave.filter.mapcnt = info->slavecnt;
> >  	ecc->dma_slave.filter.fn = edma_filter_fn;
> >  
> > -	ret = dma_async_device_register(&ecc->dma_slave);
> > +	ret = dmaenginem_async_device_register(&ecc->dma_slave);
> >  	if (ret) {
> >  		dev_err(dev, "slave ddev registration failed (%d)\n", ret);
> >  		goto err_reg1;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	if (ecc->dma_memcpy) {
> > -		ret = dma_async_device_register(ecc->dma_memcpy);
> > +		ret = dmaenginem_async_device_register(ecc->dma_memcpy);
> >  		if (ret) {
> >  			dev_err(dev, "memcpy ddev registration failed (%d)\n",
> >  				ret);
> > -			dma_async_device_unregister(&ecc->dma_slave);
> >  			goto err_reg1;
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > @@ -2439,9 +2438,6 @@ static int edma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  
> >  	if (dev->of_node)
> >  		of_dma_controller_free(dev->of_node);
> > -	dma_async_device_unregister(&ecc->dma_slave);
> > -	if (ecc->dma_memcpy)
> > -		dma_async_device_unregister(ecc->dma_memcpy);
> 
> I'm afraid this is not safe either, we need to free the dummy_slot
> _after_ the dma device is unregistered.
> 
Thanks for pointing this.

I will drop this patch ...

Thanks
Huang Shijie