[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47f1a82c-d414-a3b2-94bf-b0466450703f@sorico.fr>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 11:44:33 +0200
From: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>, aditya@...ol.io,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Ralph Sennhauser <ralph.sennhauser@...il.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
gauthier@...ol.io, alban.browaeys@...il.com,
"thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio: mvebu: Add support for multiple PWM lines
On 03/08/2018 11:42, Richard Genoud wrote:
> On 03/08/2018 11:36, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>> Hi Linus and Adita
>>
>> On dim., juil. 29 2018, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hoping for some review from Gergory, Ralph or Richard who all seem
>>> to use this driver!
>>
>> Would it be possible to resend the series adding me in CC? I would
>> like to comment the patches, but unfortunately it seems that I was in
>> none of the mailing list where the series had been sent.
>>
>> I found the patches on patchwork, and started to have a look on it for
>> example, in the patch "gpio: mvebu: Add support for multiple PWM lines
>> per GPIO chip", I wonder why the id is stored as it was not used at all.
>>
>> Having the patch inlined in an email would male the review easier.
> Same for me :)
>
Sorry, for the noise, but please use my gmail address.
Thanks !
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists