[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e50f0301-f60a-0521-7d73-dcea28721365@sorico.fr>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 11:42:56 +0200
From: Richard Genoud <richard@...ico.fr>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>, aditya@...ol.io,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Ralph Sennhauser <ralph.sennhauser@...il.com>,
Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
gauthier@...ol.io, alban.browaeys@...il.com,
"thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio: mvebu: Add support for multiple PWM lines
On 03/08/2018 11:36, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Hi Linus and Adita
>
> On dim., juil. 29 2018, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>> Hoping for some review from Gergory, Ralph or Richard who all seem
>> to use this driver!
>
> Would it be possible to resend the series adding me in CC? I would
> like to comment the patches, but unfortunately it seems that I was in
> none of the mailing list where the series had been sent.
>
> I found the patches on patchwork, and started to have a look on it for
> example, in the patch "gpio: mvebu: Add support for multiple PWM lines
> per GPIO chip", I wonder why the id is stored as it was not used at all.
>
> Having the patch inlined in an email would male the review easier.
Same for me :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists