lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 3 Aug 2018 12:31:21 +0200
From:   "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     "Zhang, Ning A" <ning.a.zhang@...el.com>
Cc:     "pombredanne@...b.com" <pombredanne@...b.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Li, Ting" <ting.li@...el.com>,
        "yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com" <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        "kstewart@...uxfoundation.org" <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "markus@...ppelsdorf.de" <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: make sure builtin firmware is page alignment

On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 08:42:25AM +0000, Zhang, Ning A wrote:
> 在 2018-08-03五的 07:39 +0200,Greg KH写道:
> > On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 09:45:21AM +0800, Zhang Ning wrote:
> > > when firmware is in filesystem, request_firmware will load it,
> > > and copy it to vmalloc memory, that is page align memory.
> > > 
> > > but when firmware is builtin, it is 8 bytes or 4 bytes alignment.
> > > 
> > > make sure builtin firmware is page algnment, that can simplify
> > > algorithm
> > > to handle firmware.
> > 
> > How is it simplified?  I don't see any such change like that here :(
> > 
> Thank you for review this patch.
> 
> When driver handles its firmware based on  page, like below:
> 
> 	struct page *p;
> 	p = vmalloc_to_page(fw->data);  // for filesystem firmware
> 	p = virt_to_page(fw->data); // for builtin firmware
> 
> but if builtin firmware is not page alignment, page pointer for builtin
> firmware is wrong, it contains memory not belong to firmware. drivers
> has to use additional code to handle this. 
> 
> if builtin firmware is also page alignment, no need additional code to
> handle builtin firmware. simplified.

But you did not change anything like this in your code, so why would I
know this?

Please fix this up submit this properly.

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ