[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180803092105.3dd68f05@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 09:21:05 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
Cc: <mingo@...hat.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, trivial@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/kthread: Make function
__kthread_queue_delayed_work static
On Fri, 3 Aug 2018 20:40:02 +0800
zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com> wrote:
> Fix the following warning.
>
> kernel/kthread.c:859:6: warning: symbol '__kthread_queue_delayed_work' was not declared. Should it be static?
This should go via the trivial tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
> ---
> kernel/kthread.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c
> index 087d18d..3c661a0 100644
> --- a/kernel/kthread.c
> +++ b/kernel/kthread.c
> @@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ void kthread_delayed_work_timer_fn(struct timer_list *t)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(kthread_delayed_work_timer_fn);
>
> -void __kthread_queue_delayed_work(struct kthread_worker *worker,
> +static void __kthread_queue_delayed_work(struct kthread_worker *worker,
> struct kthread_delayed_work *dwork,
> unsigned long delay)
Although, one could say you should align the parameters too, but that's
not a big deal. Anyway...
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
-- Steve
> {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists