[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbSE0ThGpEo2YnVQ7wW85QbAeOwmFpLczHwL3Q2W3ZF6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 19:10:22 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
"open list:ARM/Amlogic Meson..." <linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] pinctrl: meson: Add support for TEST_N gpio
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 12:00 PM Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com> wrote:
> The Amlogic Meson GX and AXG SoCs needs to do a Secure Monitor call to
> set the TEST_N pin direction.
> This patchset :
> - adds the Secure Monitor call
> - adds support int the pinctrl-meson common code
> - adds support for GXBB, GXL and AGX SoCs
A lot of trouble to access a single GPIO pin (I guess _N means "active low"?)
Is this line used for something especially important? Would be nice to
include in some commit message like patch 1/5 why we invest so much
energy to accessing this pin.
Just curious. If you're just aiming for feature completion, that is a good
reason as well :D
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists