linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] pinctrl: meson: Add support for TEST

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Aug 2018 19:10:22 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>
Cc:     Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        "open list:ARM/Amlogic Meson..." <linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] pinctrl: meson: Add support for TEST_N gpio

On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 12:00 PM Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com> wrote:

> The Amlogic Meson GX and AXG SoCs needs to do a Secure Monitor call to
> set the TEST_N pin direction.
> This patchset :
> - adds the Secure Monitor call
> - adds support int the pinctrl-meson common code
> - adds support for GXBB, GXL and AGX SoCs

A lot of trouble to access a single GPIO pin (I guess _N means "active low"?)

Is this line used for something especially important? Would be nice to
include in some commit message like patch 1/5 why we invest so much
energy to accessing this pin.

Just curious. If you're just aiming for feature completion, that is a good
reason as well :D

Yours,
Linus Walleij