[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180807110906.3a1b0ac4@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 11:09:06 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Cc: Android Kernel" <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Glexiner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 3/3] tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and
unify their usage
On Tue, 07 Aug 2018 10:48:05 -0400
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com> wrote:
> >You mean if someone add a tracepoint callback to the irq disable
> >tracepoint, and did a lockdep assert to make sure interrupts are
> >disabled?
>
> Yes that's what I meant.
That sounds like a "Doctor, it hurts me when I do this" problem ;-)
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists