[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6B9E5DC9-0859-41B4-9B72-A7D85E9EA2AD@google.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2018 11:24:13 -0400
From: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Cc: Android Kernel" <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Glexiner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 3/3] tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage
On August 7, 2018 11:09:06 AM EDT, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>On Tue, 07 Aug 2018 10:48:05 -0400
>Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com> wrote:
>
>> >You mean if someone add a tracepoint callback to the irq disable
>> >tracepoint, and did a lockdep assert to make sure interrupts are
>> >disabled?
>>
>> Yes that's what I meant.
>
>That sounds like a "Doctor, it hurts me when I do this" problem ;-)
Haha, yes true. But just to clarify, I didn't do this to see the problem but noticed it with turning on existing things. :-) but I see your point...
Thanks,
- Joel
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists