[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180807152207.GC59704@dennisz-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 08:22:08 -0700
From: Dennis Zhou <dennisszhou@...il.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, kernel-team@...com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: add percpu populated pages count to meminfo
Hi Tejun,
On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 08:11:46AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 02:12:06PM +0000, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> > > @@ -121,6 +122,7 @@ static int meminfo_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> > > (unsigned long)VMALLOC_TOTAL >> 10);
> > > show_val_kb(m, "VmallocUsed: ", 0ul);
> > > show_val_kb(m, "VmallocChunk: ", 0ul);
> > > + show_val_kb(m, "PercpuPopulated:", pcpu_nr_populated_pages());
> >
> > Populated? Can we avoid this for simplicities sake: "Percpu"?
> >
> > We do not count pages that are not present elsewhere either and those
> > counters do not have "populated" in them.
>
> Yeah, let's do "Percpu".
>
Sounds good, I've dropped populated.
Thanks,
Dennis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists