lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180807152207.GC59704@dennisz-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Aug 2018 08:22:08 -0700
From:   Dennis Zhou <dennisszhou@...il.com>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:     Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, kernel-team@...com,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: add percpu populated pages count to meminfo

Hi Tejun,

On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 08:11:46AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 02:12:06PM +0000, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> > > @@ -121,6 +122,7 @@ static int meminfo_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> > >  		   (unsigned long)VMALLOC_TOTAL >> 10);
> > >  	show_val_kb(m, "VmallocUsed:    ", 0ul);
> > >  	show_val_kb(m, "VmallocChunk:   ", 0ul);
> > > +	show_val_kb(m, "PercpuPopulated:", pcpu_nr_populated_pages());
> > 
> > Populated? Can we avoid this for simplicities sake: "Percpu"?
> > 
> > We do not count pages that are not present elsewhere either and those
> > counters do not have "populated" in them.
> 
> Yeah, let's do "Percpu".
> 

Sounds good, I've dropped populated.

Thanks,
Dennis

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ