[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1593487.Cmi0mten1c@z50>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2018 19:11:22 +0200
From: Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/12] mtd: rawnand: ams-delta: use GPIO API for data read/write
Hi Boris,
On Tuesday, August 7, 2018 7:06:27 PM CEST Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 00:29:11 +0200
> Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Don't readw()/writew() data directly from/to GPIO port which is under
> > control of gpio-omap driver, use GPIO API instead.
> >
> > Degrade of performance on Amstrad Delta is completely not acceptable.
>
> Can we have numbers along with information about where the overhead is
> when using gpiod_{get,set}_raw_array_value()?
Yes, as soon as I get physical access to the device, probably this or next
weekend.
Thanks,
Janusz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists