[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180807173424.GH2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 19:34:24 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: kan.liang@...ux.intel.com
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
len.brown@...el.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Rename Denverton and Gemini Lake
On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 10:17:27AM -0700, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Denverton and Gemini Lake are platform names and should not be used for
> Processor Family stuff. The microarchitecture codename should be used.
>
> DENVERTON is Goldmont server SoC. Rename DENVERTON to GOLDMONT2, similar
> to SILVERMONT2 being the silvermont server SoCs.
>
> Rename GEMINI_LAKE to GOLDMONT_PLUS.
>
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Thanks! the alternative to 2 is _X like we have with the big cores to
denote server chips, but this is already a nice improvement.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists