linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Rename Denverton and Gemini Lake

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1b7cb461-5321-86cf-3031-5ff545c3dc42@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Aug 2018 10:35:42 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     kan.liang@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, len.brown@...el.com,
        ak@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Rename Denverton and Gemini Lake

On 08/07/2018 10:17 AM, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> Denverton and Gemini Lake are platform names and should not be used for
> Processor Family stuff. The microarchitecture codename should be used.

Why?

Denverton is the platform.  "Goldmont" is literally the
microarchitecture, and you are suggesting moving *to* the
microarchitecture name, which contradicts the description.

I'm confused.