[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180807174851.GJ2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 19:48:51 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: kan.liang@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
len.brown@...el.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Rename Denverton and Gemini Lake
On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 10:35:42AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 08/07/2018 10:17 AM, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> > Denverton and Gemini Lake are platform names and should not be used for
> > Processor Family stuff. The microarchitecture codename should be used.
>
> Why?
>
> Denverton is the platform. "Goldmont" is literally the
> microarchitecture, and you are suggesting moving *to* the
> microarchitecture name, which contradicts the description.
All the other (big core) are uarch names. Atom is weird in that it mixes
uarch with platform names.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists