[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84be9a41-9aa9-ac39-a77c-eb6300df6e7a@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 11:29:31 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: kan.liang@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
len.brown@...el.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Rename Denverton and Gemini Lake
On 08/07/2018 10:48 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 10:35:42AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> On 08/07/2018 10:17 AM, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com wrote:
>>> Denverton and Gemini Lake are platform names and should not be used for
>>> Processor Family stuff. The microarchitecture codename should be used.
>> Why?
>>
>> Denverton is the platform. "Goldmont" is literally the
>> microarchitecture, and you are suggesting moving *to* the
>> microarchitecture name, which contradicts the description.
> All the other (big core) are uarch names. Atom is weird in that it mixes
> uarch with platform names.
Good point.
Feel free to add: Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists