[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrX4e=U21c+_9u_PrvJecDpjKiuQ-KGeW=Z3ME=a2=Kj9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 13:28:23 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <eduval@...zon.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"Liguori, Anthony" <aliguori@...zon.com>,
Daniel Gruss <daniel.gruss@...k.tugraz.at>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Waiman Long <llong@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
"David H . Gutteridge" <dhgutteridge@...patico.ca>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/mm/pti: Don't clear permissions in pti_clone_pmd()
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 1:21 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2018, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 11:34 AM, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> wrote:
>> > On 08/07/2018 03:24 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>> >> The function sets the global-bit on cloned PMD entries,
>> >> which only makes sense when the permissions are identical
>> >> between the user and the kernel page-table.
>> >>
>> >> Further, only write-permissions are cleared for entry-text
>> >> and kernel-text sections, which are not writeable anyway.
>> >
>> > I think this patch is correct, but I'd be curious if Andy remembers why
>> > we chose to clear _PAGE_RW on these things. It might have been that we
>> > were trying to say that the *entry* code shouldn't write to this stuff,
>> > regardless of whether the normal kernel can.
>> >
>> > But, either way, I agree with the logic here that Global pages must
>> > share permissions between both mappings, so feel free to add my Ack. I
>> > just want to make sure Andy doesn't remember some detail I'm forgetting.
>>
>> I suspect it's because we used to (and maybe still do) initialize the
>> user tables before mark_read_only().
>
> We still do that because we need the entry stuff working for interrupts
> early on. We now repeat the clone after mark_ro so the mask RW is not
> longer required.
Agreed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists