lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 8 Aug 2018 15:26:02 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschmidt@...il.com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: dw: support 4-16 bits per word

On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Simon Goldschmidt
<simon.k.r.goldschmidt@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 11:45 AM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Simon Goldschmidt
>> <simon.k.r.goldschmidt@...il.com> wrote:

>> n_bytes = round_up(8);
>> dma_width = round_up(8);
>
> I guess you mean:
>
> n_bytes = round_up(transfer->bits_per_word, 8);
>
> But that would yield 8 or 16 where we need 1 or 2.

Indeed.

> Reading spi-imx.c, this might work:
>
> n_bytes = DIV_ROUND_UP(transfer->bits_per_word, BITS_PER_BYTE);

Yes.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists