linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] KVM: s390: introduce and use KVM_REQ_VSIE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 9 Aug 2018 07:39:17 +0200
From:   Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] KVM: s390: introduce and use KVM_REQ_VSIE_RESTART

On 07.08.2018 14:51, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> When we change the crycb (or execution controls), we also have to make sure
> that the vSIE shadow datastructures properly consider the changed
> values before rerunning the vSIE. We can achieve that by simply using a
> VCPU request now.
> 
> This has to be a synchronous request (== handled before entering the
> (v)SIE again).
> 
> The request will make sure that the vSIE handler is left, and that the
> request will be processed (NOP), therefore forcing a reload of all
> vSIE data (including rebuilding the crycb) when re-entering the vSIE
> interception handler the next time.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>

Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)