[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180809054013.GA20507@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 22:40:13 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
aik@...abs.ru, robh@...nel.org, joe@...ches.com,
elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net, david@...son.dropbear.id.au,
jasowang@...hat.com, mpe@...erman.id.au, linuxram@...ibm.com,
haren@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@...ba.org,
srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, robin.murphy@....com,
jean-philippe.brucker@....com, marc.zyngier@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] Virtio uses DMA API for all devices
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 08:13:32AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > - if (xen_domain())
> > > + if (xen_domain() || pseries_secure_vm())
> > > return true;
> >
> > I don't think it's pseries specific actually. E.g. I suspect AMD SEV
> > might benefit from the same kind of hack.
>
> As long as they can provide the same guarantee that the DMA ops are
> completely equivalent between virtio and other PCI devices, at least on
> the same bus, ie, we don't have to go hack special DMA ops.
>
> I think the latter is really what Christoph wants to avoid for good
> reasons.
Yes. I also generally want to avoid too much arch specific magic.
FYI, I'm off to a week-long vacation today, don't expect quick replies.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists