lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ftzo9i77.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date:   Thu, 09 Aug 2018 16:18:04 +1000
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:     rashmica <rashmicy@...il.com>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/test_hexdump: fix failure on big endian cpu

rashmica <rashmicy@...il.com> writes:
> On 08/08/18 17:25, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr> writes:
>>> diff --git a/lib/test_hexdump.c b/lib/test_hexdump.c
>>> index 3f415d8101f3..626f580b4ff7 100644
>>> --- a/lib/test_hexdump.c
>>> +++ b/lib/test_hexdump.c
>>> @@ -32,16 +32,33 @@ static const char * const test_data_2_le[] __initconst = {
>>>  	"d14c", "9919", "b143", "0caf",
>>>  };
>>>  
>>> +static const char * const test_data_2_be[] __initconst = {
>>> +	"be32", "db7b", "0a18", "93b2",
>>> +	"70ba", "c424", "7d83", "349b",
>>> +	"a69c", "31ad", "9c0f", "ace9",
>>> +	"4cd1", "1999", "43b1", "af0c",
>>> +};
>>> +
>>>  static const char * const test_data_4_le[] __initconst = {
>>>  	"7bdb32be", "b293180a", "24c4ba70", "9b34837d",
>>>  	"ad319ca6", "e9ac0f9c", "9919d14c", "0cafb143",
>>>  };
>>>  
>>> +static const char * const test_data_4_be[] __initconst = {
>>> +	"be32db7b", "0a1893b2", "70bac424", "7d83349b",
>>> +	"a69c31ad", "9c0face9", "4cd11999", "43b1af0c",
>>> +};
>>> +
>> Is there a reason we can't do it all at compile time?
>
> mpe I sent a patch doing that awhile ago and you obviously didn't like
> it because you never merged it :P

Sorry, I wasn't sure who should merge it, and never followed up.

cheers

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ