linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] Auto-detect whether a FPU exists

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180809070258.GA11082@infradead.org>
Date:   Thu, 9 Aug 2018 00:02:58 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Alan Kao <alankao@...estech.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, vincentc@...estech.com,
        Andrew Waterman <andrew@...ive.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, greentime@...estech.com,
        zong@...estech.com, Darius Rad <darius@...espec.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Albert Ou <albert@...ive.com>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, nickhu@...estech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] Auto-detect whether a FPU exists

On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 02:43:36PM +0800, Alan Kao wrote:
> It does look a little bit weird.  Should I send a v6 for this?

Yes, please resend the series or just this patch.

I think the hswap.h definition should go away and we should just
keep the switch_to.h one, even if that means including the header
in another C file.