[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180809073300.GB18746@andestech.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 15:33:00 +0800
From: Alan Kao <alankao@...estech.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: <vincentc@...estech.com>, Andrew Waterman <andrew@...ive.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>, <greentime@...estech.com>,
<zong@...estech.com>, Darius Rad <darius@...espec.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Albert Ou <albert@...ive.com>,
<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <nickhu@...estech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] Auto-detect whether a FPU exists
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 12:02:58AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 02:43:36PM +0800, Alan Kao wrote:
> > It does look a little bit weird. Should I send a v6 for this?
>
> Yes, please resend the series or just this patch.
>
> I think the hswap.h definition should go away and we should just
> keep the switch_to.h one, even if that means including the header
> in another C file.
>
It turns out that only cpufeature.c and switch_to.h are affected
by hwcap.h. As switch_to.h already had extern has_fpu declaration,
the one in hwcap.h is redundant and can be removed safely.
I will resend just this patch, and mark it as v6.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists