| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <63a28213-5926-55e5-6d6c-de71a221521b@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 10:25:41 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: freude@...ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com,
cohuck@...hat.com, kwankhede@...dia.com,
bjsdjshi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
alex.williamson@...hat.com, pmorel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
alifm@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mjrosato@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
jjherne@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, thuth@...hat.com,
pasic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, berrange@...hat.com,
fiuczy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, buendgen@...ibm.com,
frankja@...ux.ibm.com, Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 07/22] KVM: s390: refactor crypto initialization
On 08.08.2018 16:44, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> This patch refactors the code that initializes and sets up the
> crypto configuration for a guest. The following changes are
> implemented via this patch:
>
> 1. Prior to the introduction of AP device virtualization, it
> was not necessary to provide guest access to the CRYCB
> unless the MSA extension 3 (MSAX3) facility was installed
> on the host system. With the introduction of AP device
> virtualization, the CRYCB must be made accessible to the
> guest if the AP instructions are installed on the host
> and are to be provided to the guest.
>
> 2. Introduces a flag indicating AP instructions executed on
> the guest shall be interpreted by the firmware. It is
> initialized to indicate AP instructions are to be
> to be interpreted and is used to set the SIE bit for
> each vcpu during vcpu setup.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@...ux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 +
> arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 1 +
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index af39561..0c13f61 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ struct kvm_s390_sie_block {
> #define ECA_AIV 0x00200000
> #define ECA_VX 0x00020000
> #define ECA_PROTEXCI 0x00002000
> +#define ECA_APIE 0x00000008
> #define ECA_SII 0x00000001
> __u32 eca; /* 0x004c */
> #define ICPT_INST 0x04
> @@ -256,6 +257,7 @@ struct kvm_s390_sie_block {
> __u8 reservede4[4]; /* 0x00e4 */
> __u64 tecmc; /* 0x00e8 */
> __u8 reservedf0[12]; /* 0x00f0 */
> +#define CRYCB_FORMAT_MASK 0x00000003
> #define CRYCB_FORMAT1 0x00000001
> #define CRYCB_FORMAT2 0x00000003
> __u32 crycbd; /* 0x00fc */
> @@ -714,6 +716,7 @@ struct kvm_s390_crypto {
> __u32 crycbd;
> __u8 aes_kw;
> __u8 dea_kw;
> + __u8 apie;
This flag is essentially always 1 as far as I can see, so please drop it
for now. (can be introduced when really needed)
> };
>
> #define APCB0_MASK_SIZE 1
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index 4cdaa55..a580dec 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_machine {
> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_PFMFI 11
> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_SIGPIF 12
> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_KSS 13
> +#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_AP 14
> struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_feat {
> __u64 feat[16];
> };
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index 19f4f44..f96a443 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
> #include <asm/sclp.h>
> #include <asm/cpacf.h>
> #include <asm/timex.h>
> +#include <asm/ap.h>
> #include "kvm-s390.h"
> #include "gaccess.h"
>
> @@ -1881,49 +1882,37 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> return r;
> }
>
> -static int kvm_s390_query_ap_config(u8 *config)
> -{
> - u32 fcn_code = 0x04000000UL;
> - u32 cc = 0;
> -
> - memset(config, 0, 128);
> - asm volatile(
> - "lgr 0,%1\n"
> - "lgr 2,%2\n"
> - ".long 0xb2af0000\n" /* PQAP(QCI) */
> - "0: ipm %0\n"
> - "srl %0,28\n"
> - "1:\n"
> - EX_TABLE(0b, 1b)
> - : "+r" (cc)
> - : "r" (fcn_code), "r" (config)
> - : "cc", "0", "2", "memory"
> - );
> -
> - return cc;
> -}
> -
> static int kvm_s390_apxa_installed(void)
> {
> - u8 config[128];
> - int cc;
> + struct ap_config_info info;
>
> - if (test_facility(12)) {
> - cc = kvm_s390_query_ap_config(config);
> -
> - if (cc)
> - pr_err("PQAP(QCI) failed with cc=%d", cc);
> - else
> - return config[0] & 0x40;
> + if (ap_instructions_available() == 0) {
> + if (ap_qci(&info) == 0)
> + return info.apxa;
> }
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * The format of the crypto control block (CRYCB) is specified in the 3 low
> + * order bits of the CRYCB designation (CRYCBD) field as follows:
> + * Format 0: Neither the message security assist extension 3 (MSAX3) nor the
> + * AP extended addressing (APXA) facility are installed.
> + * Format 1: The APXA facility is not installed but the MSAX3 facility is.
> + * Format 2: Both the APXA and MSAX3 facilities are installed
> + */
> static void kvm_s390_set_crycb_format(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd = (__u32)(unsigned long) kvm->arch.crypto.crycb;
>
> + /* Clear the CRYCB format bits - i.e., set format 0 by default */
> + kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd &= ~(CRYCB_FORMAT_MASK);
> +
> + /* Check whether MSAX3 is installed */
> + if (!test_kvm_facility(kvm, 76))
> + return;
> +
> if (kvm_s390_apxa_installed())
> kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd |= CRYCB_FORMAT2;
> else
> @@ -1941,11 +1930,13 @@ static u64 kvm_s390_get_initial_cpuid(void)
>
> static void kvm_s390_crypto_init(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> - if (!test_kvm_facility(kvm, 76))
> - return;
> -
> kvm->arch.crypto.crycb = &kvm->arch.sie_page2->crycb;
> kvm_s390_set_crycb_format(kvm);
> + /* Default setting indicating SIE shall interpret AP instructions */
> + kvm->arch.crypto.apie = 1;
> +
> + if (!test_kvm_facility(kvm, 76))
> + return;
>
> /* Enable AES/DEA protected key functions by default */
> kvm->arch.crypto.aes_kw = 1;
> @@ -2474,17 +2465,30 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_postcreate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> static void kvm_s390_vcpu_crypto_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - if (!test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 76))
> + /*
> + * If neither the AP instructions nor the MSAX3 facility are installed
> + * on the host, then there is no need for a CRYCB in SIE because the
> + * they will not be installed on the guest either.
> + */
> + if (ap_instructions_available() && !test_facility(76))
Why not turn this into
if (!test_kvm_cpu_feat(vcpu->kvm, KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_AP) &&
!test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 76))
These properties should no longer change at this point. And we simulate
exactly what the guest will see. No crycb needed. And even no comment
needed.
> return;
>
> - vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb3 &= ~(ECB3_AES | ECB3_DEA);
> + vcpu->arch.sie_block->crycbd = vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd;
> +
> + vcpu->arch.sie_block->eca &= ~ECA_APIE;
> + if (vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.apie &&
> + test_kvm_cpu_feat(vcpu->kvm, KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_AP))
> + vcpu->arch.sie_block->eca |= ECA_APIE;
>
> - if (vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.aes_kw)
> - vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb3 |= ECB3_AES;
> - if (vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.dea_kw)
> - vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb3 |= ECB3_DEA;
> + /* If MSAX3 is installed on the guest, set up protected key support */
> + if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 76)) {
> + vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb3 &= ~(ECB3_AES | ECB3_DEA);
Why not keep the original unconditional clearing?
>
> - vcpu->arch.sie_block->crycbd = vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd;
> + if (vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.aes_kw)
> + vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb3 |= ECB3_AES;
> + if (vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.dea_kw)
> + vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb3 |= ECB3_DEA;
> + }
> }
>
> void kvm_s390_vcpu_unsetup_cmma(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists