[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e1c49e8a5c93b07542899f1e8b238a70ec89801b.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2018 10:13:28 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] staging: rtl8188eu: use is_multicast_ether_addr in
rtw_xmit.c
On Thu, 2018-08-09 at 19:01 +0200, Michael Straube wrote:
> Use is_multicast_ether_addr instead of custom IS_MCAST in
> core/rtw_xmit.c.
Have you verified that all accesses are __aligned(2) ?
If so, please state that in the patch description.
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_xmit.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_xmit.c
[]
> @@ -460,10 +460,10 @@ static s32 update_attrib(struct adapter *padapter, struct sk_buff *pkt, struct p
> if ((pattrib->ether_type == ETH_P_ARP) || (pattrib->ether_type == ETH_P_PAE) || (pattrib->dhcp_pkt == 1))
> rtw_lps_ctrl_wk_cmd(padapter, LPS_CTRL_SPECIAL_PACKET, 1);
>
> - bmcast = IS_MCAST(pattrib->ra);
> + mcast = is_multicast_ether_addr(pattrib->ra);
i.e.: is pattrib->ra __aligned(2) ?
etc...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists